Thursday, January 21, 2010

Shortform v. Longform improv

For those of you reading this who aren't improv comedians or aficionados, a few definitions:

Short form improv: Sometimes known as theater games, improvisers get suggestions and act out a scene, perform a song, make puns, etc., often with some kind of rule, structure, or gimmick that needs to be followed. Most short-form games last in the 3-5 minute range, are ended, and then changed to something with a completely different set of instructions.

Long form improv: Although there can still be some kind of overall structure to the performance piece (i.e., "The Harold"), it's more of a free-form style, focusing on scenework. A wide variety of styles can fall under the umbrella of long form. Generally, the audience provides one suggestion to the cast, the cast uses that suggestion to generate ideas and use that as a starting inspiration point for the entire show.

I feel very fortunate. My early training and experience (mostly through Improv Nashville) allowed me the opportunity to see, rehearse, perform, and appreciate both longform and short form improv comedy.

Is one style "better" than the other? In my humble opinion, no.

Short form advocates say that playing 3-5 minute games forces players to focus on building the who/what/where of a scene right away, getting to the important part of a scene. But isn't that also an important skill for longform players?

Longform advocates tout the importance of focusing on the relationship between two characters. But shortform players need this just as much.

Which one do audiences prefer? I've seen good and bad shows for both skill sets. It's the quality of the performer, not the style of the show, that makes for good improv comedy.

Which should improvisers study? Both, if the opportunity presents itself. Studying only longform and refusing to study shortform (or vice versa) is like a boxer that will only practice punching with his right fist. Yeah, you'll be incredible with your one strength, but not being well-rounded will only make you suffer in the long run.

So for beginning improvisers wondering where to start, or experienced improvisers looking to better their performances, I say get yourself well-rounded. Some of the best longform players at iO that I've seen have their pictures on the wall at ComedySportz. Many have taken classes, taught classes, coached teams, and performed both styles.

What do I hope to have at any future improv theater venture? Anything and everything. I will encourage the ensemble to try their hand at different styles. Of course, play to your strength and do what you love the most, but don't ever stop trying to develop yourself as a player.

No comments:

Post a Comment